Final Exam, HIST 4520
Fall, 2012
Scope of the Exam:
Lectures - This exam covers all of the lectures after the Mexican Revolution. That includes:
Readings:
Instructions:
This is a take home final. You will write two essays from the essay questions listed below. Note: Two of the questions have a version A and a Version B. You can only do one version of each of these questions. For all essays, I will assume you have done the appropriate reading. If you make use of any source other than the three above or my lecture notes, please give appropriate citations. Plagiarism will not be tolerates - no cutting and pasting off the internet!
Be sure to include in your exam an e-mail address or phone number where I can contact you.
Due date and submission:
This is due on Friday, December 14. You can submit by e-mail to tcorse@tnstate.edu or bring it to my office. You may also leave it my mailbox in the HGPS office.
Essay list. Choose two. you may do only one version of the two questions that have versions.
1.
Revolutions question:
Version
A:
Compare
the Nicaraguan, Cuban, and Bolivian revolutions. To what extent were the causes
and goals of these revolutions similar? What differences can you find in their
causes and goals?
Version
B:
Compare
the Nicaraguan, Cuban, and Bolivian revolutions. To what extent can they be
considered “success” or “failures”? Support your answer with concrete examples.
4.
Why did so many reform movements emerge in Latin America in the middle part of
the 1900s? What were their common characteristics? What factors tended to foster
success, and what factors tended to limit success? (In other words why and how
did they succeed or fail?)
5.
Using Guatemala as an example, discuss the impact of the Cold War and National
Security Doctrine governments on people living under them. This question is
open-ended, and you can approach from any number of directions. I will not mark
you down for failure to focus on any particular thing, but will grade you on
your development of the themes that you choose. I will assume for this essay
that you have read Silence on the Mountain.
Version A:
Discuss the importance of silence, of hiding the truth about repression, in
countries ruled by National Security Doctrine governments. Why was silence so
important to these governments? Who benefited from silence and who suffered? How
did people struggle again silence? Give concrete examples from at least two
countries in your response.
Version B:
Discuss the roots of National Security Doctrine, including the relationship
between the Cold War Ethos and National Security Doctrine. Why did these
governments feel justified in repressing and killing their citizens?