The Scientific Revolution I
Copernicus to Kepler - The Heliocentric Universe
Ptolemy and Aristotle - The pre-Scientific Revolution paradigm
The basic scientific paradigm of late medieval Europe depended primarily on two men - Aristotle and Ptolemy
Aristotle - Greek philosopher, 384-322 BC - established fundamentals of logic, expanded on Plato's development of a geo-centric universe.
Ptolemy - Greek astronomer, 87 -150 AD - developed a system for predicting movement of planets based on a geocentric (Earth-centered) universe (followed Aristotle in using circles within circles to describe planetary motion.)
Features of the Ptolemaic/Aristotelian paradigm
Earth is at center of the universe
The heavens are perfect (hence, everything in the heavens is a perfect circle or a sphere)
Planets, moon, and sun are attached to crystalline spheres that rotate through the heavens
Since Earth is clearly imperfect, it is very different from the heavens, and vice versa
Personal observation can be fully trusted (We know the Sun goes around the Earth because that's what it looks like it does)
Ancient thinkers are the best source of knowledge (particularly the Greeks, Romans, and the Bible)
Some aspects of the universe are inherently mysterious, known only to God
By Copernicus's time, this was already in trouble
Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543)
Polish mathematician and astronomer; also a church administrator
Recognized that Ptolemaic system was in trouble, exceedingly complicated and poor at making accurate predictions
Proposed in his book, On the Revolution of Heavenly Spheres (1543), that the problems with Ptolemy could be solved by putting Sun at center - heliocentric universe
Formulated as an hypothesis - does not seek to prove it through observation or proposed tests
Solves the the problem of retrograde (backwards) motion of planets, the perennial theoretical problem in astronomy for millennia
Remains committed to a number of ancient ideas
Keeps planets on crystalline spheres, which rotate because that is the natural motion of spheres
Since they are attached to perfect spheres, the planets move in circular orbits
Meant to preserve as much as possible of the Aristotelian universe, but no longer geo-centric.
Solves motion problem in a neo-Aristotelian fashion - We don't fly off the spinning Earth because of our natural tendency to be drawn to the Earth and we share in its circular motion
Like Ptolemy, still needs complex system of orbits within orbits to make predictions
Not adopted by many people at the time
Unfortunately, his system did a worse job of predicting motion of planets than Ptolemy
Many people remained convinced we would fly off a spinning Earth
Because stars show no parallax (to the naked eye), Copernicus's system required an immense universe, which was unacceptable to most
Tycho Brahe (1546-1601)
Wealthy Danish noble, devoted life to astronomy
Would build most advanced observatory in Europe and collect some of the best available observations
While he rejected Copernicus, made observations that severely challenged the Ptolemaic system
Using parallax (or lack of it) showed that the nova of 1572 really was a "new star" and not an atmospheric phenomenon
Able to show the nova was as far away as the stars
This meant the heavens were not as immutable as previously thought
Also able to use parallax to show comet of 1577 was not an atmospheric phenomenon
Again shows heavens not completely immutable
Also shoed that comet seemed to travel through the "solid" crystalline spheres the planets were supposed to be attached to
Proposed a geoheliocentric universe
Sun and moon orbit unmoving Earth, while other planets orbit Sun
Seemed to be better at predicting motion of planets than Copernican heliocentrism
Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
Mathematician, astronomer, early convert to Copernican system
The Cosmographic Mystery (1597)
Proposed that the orbits of planets adhered to the five perfect solids
This was wrong, but it worked well enough that it got him hired by Brahe
Also, represented an early attempt at a completely mathematical model for the universe.
Because of class and intellectual differences, Brahe and Kelper did not get along, and Kepler did not gain access to all of Brahe's observation until Brahe died
Astronomia Nova (1609)
Solved basic problem of Copernican system by dispensing with crystalline spheres and perfect circles (by getting rid of them).
First two of his three laws of planetary motion
Planets move in ellipses, with Sun at one focus of the ellipse
Radii sweep out an equal area in equal time period for all part of the orbit
Harmonice Mundi (1619) included the third law
the square of the time of a planets orbit is proportional to the cube of its radius
This boiled planetary motion down to a simple mathematical formula; highly unusual for the time
Dissertatio cum Nuncio Sidereo (1610) provided strong support to Gallileo's work on moons of Jupiter
Largely ignored in his own lifetime
A genuinely fully mathematical model of the universe that completely ignores Aristotle and Ptolemey.
Would be extremely influential on Newton (who showed that Kepler's model still needed some tweaking).