Classical Greek Thought
A New Approach to Nature
- Unique Features of Classical Greek (c.500 BC-300 BC) Approach to
Nature
- Cultural context
- Different than Egypt, China, elsewhere, in that large
bureaucratic kingdoms do not develop
- Small city states on islands or isolated mountain villages
- Poor soil and deforestation meant Greeks dependent on trade,
as well as need to export excesses population to found colonies
- Thus aware of many cultures, open to ideas from many places
- Politics of the Greek city-state
- Most communities had small population
- Importance of street and market life created a very
intimate context
- Modest wealth of city-states limits growth in gap between
elites and masses
- All this fosters a belief in the importance of the
individual citizen and vigorous political debate
- Political debate also fostered by the multiple forms and
examples of different governments in city-states
- Competition between city-states also fostered debate
- Political debate increasingly hinges on logical
persuasion in the public forum
- From debate over politics, debate over functioning of
nature is not a large leap
- Invention of Natural Philosophy
- Effort to develop a theoretical understanding of nature from which
individual phenomena could be explained
- Detached from any practical consideration
- Knowledge for the sake of knowledge, not to be able to
build thins or make predictions
- Self consciously theoretical inquiries into the state of
nature
- Plato (427-347 BC) argued that pursuit of knowledge for
improving a craft was inferior to pursuit of knowledge for understanding
true nature of the universe
- De-individualizes nature - seeks to find cause of all earthquakes, all
floods, all cycles of growth and reproduction, etc, not just individual
cases
- Lack of state support for education and scholarship
- Unlike China, Mesopotamia, Egypt and elsewhere, no
state-sponsored schools to train scribes, engineers, etc.
- Some informal schools sponsored by tuition and wealth
individuals
- Natural philosophers were independently wealthy or supported
themselves as teachers, doctors, and engineers
- Thus approach to study of nature was highly individualistic
- Scientific authorship
- Theories of nature attributed to individual philosophers
- Gives rise to recognizable schools of thought
- Secularizes nature - seeks natural causes for phenomena, not spiritual
ones
- Importance of theories of matter
- Various schools of though seeking to explain universe by studying what
its underlying constituent parts or substances are
- While "fire, earth, air, and water" approach becomes most important. a
minor school called the atomists originates idea that universe is built
out of small, indivisible particles
- The Pythagoreans and the importance of mathematics and numbers
- Pythagoras (c. 569-475) founds a "school" (more of a cult) devoted to,
among other things, the study of numbers
- Introduces abstract mathematics to the study of nature
- Places number as the basis of the universe
- Believed that the universe was constructed out of pure, abstract
mathematical forms
- Will lead, by c.300 BC, to the development of the mathematical proof
with the the work of Euclid in geometry
- Plato (428-347 BC)
- Founds the Academy
- Begins the creation of a synthesis of ideas from a number of
earlier thinkers
- Imagined a geometric universe, based on perfect geometric forms
- Saw the universe as a collection of nested spheres, with the planets
circling the Earth in perfect circles
- This theory will prompt research and further study by other
thinkers, particularly on the problem of planetary motion
- Distinct schools of thought emerge based on work derived from Plato's
model
- Communication between scholars, references to each other's work ,
indicates the emergence of a community of natural philosophers
- Aristotle (384-332 BC)
- Founds the Lyceum (informally, becomes more institutionalized
after his death)
- Will be extraordinarily influential over Roman, medieval
Christian and medieval Islamic thought
- Engaged in purely theoretical research with no practical
purpose in mind
- Believed science came after technology; once practical problems
were solved, men of leisure had time to think about nature
- Believed sensation and observation, understood through logic,
to be only reliable route to knowledge
- Depended on common-sense approach to observation and theory
- Aristotle's Universe
- Agreed with Plato about the four elements - fire, earth, air, and
water
- Believed however that underlying this were four qualities:
hot, cold, wet, and dry
- Manipulating these four qualities could change matter
- This created the theoretical bases for Western and Islamic
alchemy
- Divided physics of Earth from that of the heavens - since things went
up and down on Earth but in circles in the heavens, the heavens must be
different
- Saw motion as a crucial phenomenon for understanding universe
- Natural motion on Earth was cause by a things nature - air
is light so it moves up, stone is heavy so it moves down, etc.
- In its perfect form, all things in the universe or in place
and static, until set in motion by a Prime Mover (would be used as a
proof for existence of God in medieval Christian theology)
- Forced motion depends on a mover, such as a horse pulling a
cart
- All movement must be through some kind of medium, like air
or water
- Without friction, speed and motion would be infinite
- Without a medium to push against, nothing could move
- Aristotle argued that therefore the planets must move
through "aether," a perfect, unchanging substance
- Since nothing moves at infinite speed, there can be no
vacuum
- Aristotle also very influential in biology
- Developed an extensive taxonomy
- Study of embryos reinforced his belief that the process of "becoming"
was simply an expression of the natural potentials inherent in all things
in the universe
- His ideas give rise to research and debate, providing a
theoretical model for investigation of nature in European and Islamic worlds