Legacy and Enemies of Porfiriato
I. The era of Porfirio Diaz (1876-1911)
- Plan de Tuxtepec (1876)
- leads a revolt in 1876 when Lerdo tried to rig the election
- Promises effective suffrage and no-reelection
- War hero, strongly supported by military
- Grants concessions to those who support him, while brutally crushing
opposition
- In first term, takes popular nationalist stance against USA
- Reduces government corruption
- Stands aside to allow ally Manuel Gomez to be elected in 1882
- Returns to presidency in 1888
- Governance and policies
- Modernized the army, able to use it to consolidate control over
regional areas
- Railroads built to enable small army to ensure control and defeat
rebellions
- Rurales (rural military police) increased
- Given broad freedom to violently out down banditry
- Some 10,000 individuals "shot while trying to escape" (ley
fuga)
- Decrease in banditry and rebellion encourages foreign investment
- Liberal anti-clerical laws left on books, but not enforced -- a
truce in church-state relations\
- Improved relations with local governments
- Became personal friends with most governors, and helped them
impose control
- Didn't always work; relations with elites in the northern border
states often poor
- Expanded the federal payroll 900% - government becomes main engine
for growth of the middle class
- Expanded education
- Mostly emphasized higher education
- Expansion of primary education focused on cities, for the
children of elite and professional classes
II. Achievements
- Technological progress
- built railway network 15,500 miles - seen as magic talisman for progress
- Expansion of electricity, telephone, telegraph, international banking,
early industry
- copied the Capitalist West
- Winners
- raw material exporters
- big merchant importers
- bankers
- infant middle class (within limits)
- ensured loyalty of Army by giving access to public trough to officers
- proclaimed policy of conciliation with Church
- Several elite families emerge as powerful economic conglomarates
III. Nature of Growth
- Importance of foreign investment
- 1. 60% of foreign investment came from USA, mostly in mines and
railroads
- Free trade zone set up along the border in 1885, USA quickly
gains 40% of Mexican trade
- U.S. monopolies allowed to develop in some industries
- Diaz
perused a number of policies to encourage foreign investment, despite
his own mistrust of the USA
- Railroad had unintended consequences
- drove price of land
- concentrated land more
- allowed debt peons to escape
- encouraged migration to prosperous regions
- encouraged manufacturing as transport of goods became cheaper
- speculation produced enormous graft
- railroad control in foreign hands - best jobs, better pay
- railroads encouraged modern agriculture, which led to more exploitation
- Industrialization
- large numbers of factories built
- many staffed and financed by foreigners
- economy of scale produced high prices
- Working Class
- 800,000 workers
- mostly in light industry, but also mining,
communications, and transportation
- 16-18 hour days
- many deductions from wages
- no worker protections
- Many made less than a dollar a week
- appalling living conditions led to a mortality rate twice that of USA
- economic problems 1900-1910 squeezed them out, as price of
food doubled while salaries remained stagnant
- salaries did not change while food doubled
- These people did not share positivist values
- some 250 strikes during the Diaz period
- strongly
nationalistic -- many strikes aimed against foreign employers and
privileges of foreign workers
- Middle Class
- middle class some 8-10% of population
- middle class aped the style of the rich; tended to overspend
- hodpodge not culturally unified
- growing middle class could not find enough jobs - eked out living as teachers, etc
- Greatly resented that select few enjoyed political spoils
- very little turnover in offices
- Advent of industry brought new values
- cyclical markets caused a number of disruptions
- ironically, most advanced regions became most troubled
- Sonora richest state, from USA financed mining, but had little political power
IV. Land
- 95% of rural population had none
- Only 10% of Indian communities still had land -- ejidos shrank in
face of railroads, expansion of commercial agriculture and ranching
- Heavy
privatization of land
- 1000 families owned most of Mexico
- 1/4 owned by foreigner, 1/4 by 200 families
- Huge pressure form great majority of population, which was landless peasants
V. Race
- 8.7 million became 15 million during Pofiriato
- 20% white, 43% mestizo, 37% Indian
- But white positivist technocrats (cientificos), a few
elite families, foreigners, and military held most of power
VI. Clearly, Mexico explosive