State and Society on the Eve of the Industrial Revolution
New political ideas in the Early Modern era
Europe and its empires
Emergence of the nation-state
dreams of reviving unity of Roman Empire fade
no power - not the Church, not the Holy Roman Empire, nor any other single country strong enough
Kings gained more power to tax
build bigger bureaucracies, and armies - allows for greater control
also enables them to gain loyalty by giving out jobs
increasingly, central governments have stronger control over people and resources of the territory they control
greater religious unity, spread of national languages helps cement link between people (nation) and government (state)
Sovereignty seen as resting in the state - not in rivals like the church or the aristocracy
Increasing belief that states may do whatever is needed to insure sovereignty - realpolitik
tempered by belief in a natural "law of nation" that required states to recognize each other sovereignty
Muslim Empires - the "Gunpowder Empires"
Ottomans
sovereignty lies in the Sultan
government should pursue a rational exploitation of conquered people's resources
Janissaries represent the centralized and rationalized training of an imperial bureaucracy to carry this out
allows for a fair degree of stability in Early Modern period
Mughals and Safavids
empire as right of conquest - spoils of conquest to be divided among relations and allies of leaders
more heavy handed in tribute demands than Ottomans, these methods ultimately foster instability and resentment
China
Traditionally, sovereignty claimed by the emperor
This balanced by the power of the mandarins, Confucian bureaucrats dedicated to maintaining a peaceful balance of interests in China (and their own position)
Manchu conquests in 1644 provide a tremendous shock
conquest by the foreign Manchu and establishment of the Qing dynasty calls into question old ideas
In response, some scholars propose that sovereignty lies in the people - Huang Zongxi (1610-95); Lu Liulang (1629-83)
but this sovereignty was imagined as giving the the people the right to replace corrupt dynasties with new ones, not establish republics
New developments in Imperial Expansion in the Early Modern era
The British in India
Mughal power was weakened by rebellions, stirred by Mughal tribute demands and religious conflict
British able to play on local rulers disaffection with Mughals, unite them in opposition
British East India Company seizes control of resource rich Bengal in 1757
Becomes nucleus of a growing land empire
British gain access and control over a growing market for their goods
Many local rulers ally with British
prefer distant emperors to nearby ones
British help them consolidate local rule
Empires in the Americas
British, Spanish, and Portuguese empires expand in 1600s and 1700s
British and Portuguese expansion based on commerce
Portuguese find gold and silver in interior of Brazil
Fishing, tobacco, and forest products provide basis for British expansion in North America
Spanish expansion primarily a products of religious work, as missions are built on the frontiers of empire
Rebellion
All three face rebellion in the late 1700s
Creolization a factor - greater identification with local identities
Reactions against increased intervention and direct control from mother countries
increased taxation in British colonies after the Seven Year War (also called the French and Indian War)
greater efforts and centralization in Spanish Empire (Bourbon Reforms) and Portuguese Empire (Pombaline Reforms)
Successful rebellion in British colonies in 1770s and 1780s
Rebellions temporarily frustrated in Spanish and Portuguese empires
Napoleonic disruptions produce independence in Spanish and Portuguese zones c. 1807-1826
New social structures in the Early Modern
Old social structures break down in Europe
Medieval society based on "corporate" communities
based on birth or profession
united people from disparate income groups into single interest groups (making them vertically integrated)
these interest groups - guilds, the aristocracy, the clergy - competed with each other for privilege
increasingly in 1600s and 1700s, these corporate communities break down
Family identity on a small, nuclear scale becomes more important - in part because of spread of Protestantism
Protestantism also eliminates religious brotherhoods and fraternities, reorganizes the clergy, weakens guilds
In part, this will pave way to both greater individualism and social organization based on economic status
A commercial, pre-industrial society emerges in Japan (1600s-1700s)
years of peace lessens importance of military classes that had dominated society
increasing food supply allows for larger population
larger population, surplus food allows for development of large commercial and manufacturing sectors with more labor and more customers
Regional identities replaced by national identities
Qing Dynasty China (after 1644)
rulers are foreign - ethnically Manchu, from Manchuria
sought to spread Chinese identity as way to unite empire and maintain legitimacy
helped in part by large internal migrations
In Europe, centralized governments and printing, allow for spread of national languages, replacing local ones
Regional identities replace imperial identities
Creolization becomes stronger in European New World empires
mixing of cultures creates new creoles cultures quite distinct from Britain Spain, Portugal, and France
long periods of isolation also foster sense of self-reliance, local identity
Maroon communities of escaped slaves establish de facto independence, develop heavily creolized cultures
In Europe, breakdown if imperial power in "Germany" and "Italy" fosters local nationalism
Overall, social and cultural norms on the eve if the Industrial Revolution are in an enormous state of flux