Politics and Thought of the Industrialized World
Growth of Nationalism
New concept of nation emerges in Europe in early 19th century
Defined as a people who share:
ethnicity
language
race
culture
Nationalism holds that nations are indissoluble and should rule themselves as a single unit
linked to Romantic belief in adherence to the truth of nature
advanced by populist and democratizing influence of American and French revolutions
related also to Roseau's General Will
Politically explosive in Europe
rejected the idea that a country is defined by the sovereignty of a king
some multi-ethnic states begin to suffer instability
some multi-ethnic states embark on efforts homogenize their populations as a result
can result in violent ethnic cleansing
more commonly, seen in efforts to enforce use of a single language and denying the separate existent of certain ethnic groups
Originates largely in Europe, soon spreads to other regions
Latin America
inspires in part the independence wars of 1807-26
helps insure that the Spanish empire will break apart into several different countries
Portuguese empire remains intact in Brazil in large part because of unifying national symbol of the emperor
Ottoman Empire
gradual decline inspires nationalist movements
tends to work against replacement by a new Empire, but by local national entities like Egypt
New Ideas in Governance
Constitutionalism
written, explicit constitutions defining state powers and citizens' rights slowly emerge in 19th century Europe
support the idea that government obtains its powers from law, not tradition or religion
tended to expand public participation in government, but not universally
outside of Europe
Japan authors a conservative constitution in 1882
new Latin American countries write constitutions that are largely ignored
other experiments in constitutionalism emerge in places on the fringes of European empires
Rise of the modern, centralized state
Militarization
industrialized armies allow for greater centralization of power
United States, Germany, Italy, and Japan all see industrialized regions win wars of centralization
creation of large armies provides opportunities for expansion or creation single national cultures
new industrialized militaries without loyalty to a centralized state will prove dangerously destabilizing
Bureaucratic centralization
Increasingly, decentralized and hereditary officials replaced with professional, centralized bureaucrats
new bureaucrats marked by importance of education, loyalty to central governments
aided by expansion of new information technologies, such as telegraph and modern bookkeeping techniques
along with military, used as a powerful centralizing force - the most successful modern states have the most efficient bureaucracies
New Political Trends
Democracy
Modern democratic state originates in the United States
representative legislature
widespread suffrage
political parties
effectively republican - either no monarchy, or very limited monarchies
Resisted in early 19th century Europe
violence of French Revolution strengthened anti-democratic attitudes of European elites
initial efforts at constitutionalism reinforced elite power
new states emerging from Ottoman Empires embrace democracy as a way to repudiate old aristocracy
Industrialized states like France and Britain slowly embrace suffrage as a means to accommodate and incorporate rapidly expanding populations
In most parts of Europe, remains more limited than U.S. democracy in19th century
Socialism and its critics
Rooted in Enlightenment ideals of egalitarianism and the perfectibility of mankind
Many schools of thought, centered around certain common themes
communal ownership of property
amelioration of the plight of workers
importance of self-help and education of the working class to bring about socialism
transition to socialism would be voluntary
Karl Marx (1818-1883), Germany (does much of his work in Britain)
most influential of the more radical socialist thinkers
saw history as passing through stages, each based on the conflict between the owners of the modes of production and everyone else
saw current stage of industrial capitalism as marked by the conflict between workers (proletariat) and the ownership class (bourgeoisie)
this conflict would inevitably lead to revolution because of the problem of the surplus value of labor
workers are paid only a fraction of the value they create, enough to survive on
factory owners invest this "surplus value" into more efficient technology, resulting in the need for less labor
cost of labor goes down, which makes it harder for workers to survive, and means customer base shrinks, financial basis of capitalism becomes unstable
workers gain a revolutionary consciousness, and revolt
end result would be Communism, a state managed utopia in which which class conflict would be removed through communal ownership of property
Anarchism
in general, a belief that the state must be dismantled in order to ensure human freedom
becomes a basis for violent terrorist attacks in the the late 19th century
like Marx, most anarchists believed that violent revolution was inevitable and necessary
unlike Marx and most more moderate socialists, rejected the state as the means for creating or managing utopia
Anarchist thinkers like John Most (1846-96) argued revolution should begin with violent destruction of elites and state power
Utilitarianism
critical of capitalist state, but also rejects socialism as avenue of reform
Jeremy Bentham’s (1748-1842)
no natural rights, only pain vs. pleasure
society should maximize pleasure for the greatest number
reform society along pleasure maximization laws
"social utility" - what creates the greatest good for the greatest number - is the guide for reform
John Stuart Mills (1806-1873)
adds natural rights to utilitarianism, rejecting the idea that the greatest good for the greatest number is the guide for reform
rather, the state should act to prevent harm to the individual
freedom for the individual is paramount
this freedom must however, take place in the context of social priorities
those who benefit from society must give something in return as well