Rivals, Threats, and
Traders with Europe
I. Introduction
-
A. New Muslim empires ruled by Turkic peoples develop in 1500s-1700s
-
1. Large, wealthy empires established by Central Asian Turkic speakers
- a. Ottoman Empire - Eastern Mediterranean and Middle
East
- b. Safavids - Persia/Iran
- c. Mughals - Northern India and surrounding areas
-
2. Known as "Gunpowder Empires" for their use of new technologies
-
3. Controlled important trade routes, making them quite wealthy
-
4. Weakened by long-term war
-
5. Population tended to expand more slowly than in other
regions
-
B. Central importance of Islam to Muslim empires
-
1. Ottomans early in their history emphasized the importance of the
ghazi - the warrior for faith
-
2. Safavids Promoted Shiism, which brought them in
conflict with the Sunni Ottomans
-
3. Mughals, ruling in mainly Hindu India, went from
indifference, to tolerance, to fanaticism, which weakened the empire
-
C. Willingness to accept other faiths within Muslim Empires
-
1. other faiths had their own leaders
-
2. those leaders often had to collect taxes for the Muslim lords
-
3. those leaders also had to be responsible for the actions of their adherents under their laws
-
4. Differed from Christian empires, which tended to seek to convert all
their subjects
-
5. Mughals shift to fanaticism weakened their empire
-
D. Administration and systems of government
-
1. created strong support systems in the empires under exceptional rulers at the top
-
2. created elite from non-Muslim populations--fostering support
-
a. i.e.. the Janissary Corps in the Ottoman Empire
- i. Christian boys taken at an early age from
parents
- ii. converted to Islam, trained for military and
government
- iii. only loyalty was to the Sultan and themselves
-
b. also done in India
-
3. administration largely based on skill and intelligence, not rank or birth
-
4. schools and training established for skilled underlings to become administrators
-
5. created patriotic, smart, and knowledgeable administers from across multi-ethnic empires
-
6. However, Central Asian tradition of family management
of empires created succession conflicts
-
E. Created highly efficient military
-
1. commander in chief was also the emperor
-
2. strength in numbers--huge number of men under arms
-
3. technologically behind the West, but willing to learn
-
4. "Gunpowder Empires"- new Muslim empires that gained power around the
1400s and 1500s in part by using the Western technology of guns and
cannon
- a. increasing reliance on guns in military
- b. excellent training for infantry
- 5. provided means for expansion and maintenance of huge empires
-
D. Success based on leadership
- 1. since military and administration focused on one man--the emperor
- 2. great emperors would make great empires, and vice versa
- 3. similar to the fate of absolutism in Europe
- 4. Weakened as economies and government declined
- a. less expansion as empires matured made it harder to
reward followers
- b. steady loss of trade routed to Europeans
- c. religious decline and decline of dynastic families
weakened empires as well
II. The Ottoman Turks
-
A. One of the most impressive empire of the last 500 years
- B. Incredibly large, rich, and diverse
- C. After slowly taking over the old Byzantine lands,
takes Constantinople in 1453
- 1. Eastern Orthodox Christian Empire--sat between Europe and Asia
- 2. last vestiges of the Roman Empire as it had been split in 300
- 3. Constantinople had been great for almost 1000 years
- 4. had been weakened by the sack of Constantinople by the Crusaders in 1250
- 5. its fall symbolic of the loss of the middle east to Turks, their incursion into Europe
- D. By 1453, however, Turks had moved well into Europe
- 1. sat at the edge of the Habsburg empire, the Holy Roman Empire
- 2. continually attacked the Catholic HR Emperor, making it difficult to put down Protestantism!
- 3. when they took Hungarian territory, they attracted the Bogomils
- a. who had fought Orthodox and Catholics alike
- b. began the Bosnian/Serbian/Hungarian Muslim connection that exists today
-
E. Apex of Ottoman Empire--Suleiman the Magnificent (1520-1566)
- 1. responsible for restarting the pressure of the empire on Europe
- 2. invaded Hungary, took it
- 3. made it all the way to Vienna by 1526, where they were finally stopped
- 4. took control of Eastern Mediterranean as well
- 5. would hold most of Hungary until 1699 when they lost it to the Austrian
Empire
-
6. would hold much of northern Greece too until late 1500s
III. Safavid Empire in Persia (Iran)
-
A. Difference between this and Turkish Empire
- 1. Persian language (Farsi) vs. Turkik languages
- 2. religious differences
- 3. ethnic differences of leaders
- B. Importance of Islam even stronger here
- 1. Sunnis vs. Shi'ias--quick explanation
- 2. importance of Shiite leader being related to Mohammed
- 3. Safavid rulers in Persia were Shiite
- 4. differentiated themselves from the rest of the middle east--not Arabs in that sense
- C. Extraordinary advances in arts and literature of Persia under these shahs, i.e.. Abbas I (ruled 1587-1629)
- D. Quick (so to speak) rise and fall of Safavid empire, compared to Turks
- 1. 1501-1723, so only about 200 years
- 2. similar in administration and makeup of inhabitants as Ottoman
- Empire--many kinds of subjects
- 3. later emperors did not have the same abilities, slowly lost territory to Afghan
rebels (!) and Turks
IV. Mughal Empire in India
-
A. Importance of Islam v. Hinduism
- 1. Islam was a religion of conquest
- 2. Turks won India from a huge Indian army through the use of muskets in 1524
- 3. Turks, under Babur, began a new age of Muslim rule in India
- 4. Even to this day there is discrimination between Muslim and Hindu
- 5. Therefore Islam was less successful here, where there was already a strong central religion
- 6. Early beginnings of Muslim/Christian/Hindu conflicts world wide could be seen here
-
B. Importance of Trade for India
- 1. tremendous goods for trade
- 2. Portuguese originally had nothing to trade in return!
- 3. India, however, would become most interesting to the English merchant marine
- 4. English East India Company would infiltrate India slowly but surely until takeover in 1858
- C. Apex of empire--Emperor Akbar (ruled 1556-1605)
- 1. a sort of renaissance man
- a. military leader
- b. musician
- c. polo player
- d. metal worker
- e. even gun designer!
- 2. tried to create a syncretic religion
- 3. tried to get rid of old practices
- a. ended poll tax on hindus
- b. ended discrimination against hindus
- c. even took a Hindu consort, much to the rage of devout Muslims
-
D. Slide downwards
- 1. Aurangzeb got rid of ancient practices
- a. wives burning themselves on husbands' funeral pyres
- b. castration
- c. yet was also militantly Muslim
- d. made Hindi population dislike him
- 2. "heavy hand" plus Safavid conquest helped to bring down the empire
IV. Reasons for loss of power for Muslim empires
-
A. Empires were based on land routes, not sea travel
- B. Europeans, especially Portuguese, could trade by sea with India and the far East
- C. No seafaring tradition meant that the Muslim empires could not keep up
- D. In India, especially, leadership weakened after Akbar
- E. 17th-19th centuries would see the great leap forward for European science and technology
- 1. would lead to ever more efficient ways of killing people by Europeans
- 2. would force Muslims to trade even if they didn't want to
- 3. would force the empires to accept European presence in their cities
- a. cities would become Europeanized somewhat
- b. cities, then surrounding area would finally be taken by Europeans for their
own
- 4. Muslim science and technology, very strong in the 8th-15th C., would wane compared to Europe
- F. Don't take this too seriously, though--Ottoman Empire lasted until 1917!