Context for Learning Rubric-100pts |
|||||
Name:____________________ |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Points |
Criteria | Unacceptable | Developing | Acceptable |
Exemplary |
|
Context for Learning:
ABOUT THE SCHOOL, CLASSROOM, AND STUDENTS 10 points |
NO INFORMATION OR DESCRIPTION PROVIDED | MISSING INFORMATION/VAGUE DESCRIPTION PROVIDED | MOST REQUIRED INFORMATION INCLUDED GIVING A SOMEWHAT CLEAR PICTURE OF THE SCHOOL, CLASSROOM, AND STUDENTS | ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION INCLUDED, GIVING CLEAR PICTURE OF THE SCHOOL, CLASSROOM, AND STUDENTS | |
DESCRIPTION/REFLECTION OF THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF THE CLASSROOM 10 points |
NO DESCRIPTION OF CLASSROOM PROVIDED | Vague DESCRIPTION OF CLASSROOM PROVIDED (or no floor plan attached) |
Good DESCRIPTION OF CLASSROOM PROVIDED (with Floor plan attached) | Detailed DESCRIPTION OF CLASSROOM PROVIDED (with Floor plan attached) | |
Descriptions of Reading/LA/SS
Curricula
APPROACHES/PROGRAMS 30 points |
NO DESCRIPTION OF Language Arts PROVIDED | Vague DESCRIPTION OF Language Arts PROVIDED | Good DESCRIPTION OF Language Arts PROGRAMS PROVIDED | Detailed DESCRIPTIONS OF Reading/Language Arts/SS Curricula PROVIDED | |
Directed OBSERVATIONS OF Reading/LA/SS Lessons or Activities 20 points |
NO OBSERVATIONS COMPLETED | 1-2 OBSERVATIONS COMPLETED-lacking detail | 2 OBSERVATIONS COMPLETED-some detail | 3 Detailed OBSERVATIONS COMPLETED-(Reading/Writing/SS) | |
Description of the Students 20 points |
Poor Description | Vague description of students' academic background, language development and abilities, social and emotional development, and family and community context. | Somewhat detailed description of students' academic background, language development and abilities, social and emotional development, and family and community context. | Detailed description of students' academic background, language development and abilities, social and emotional development, and family and community context. | |
Quality of Writing 10 points |
Poorly written with numerous grammatical, stylistic, and typographical errors. | Fairly well-written with numerous grammatical, stylistic, and typographical errors. | Well-written with 1 or 3 grammatical, stylistic, and typographical errors. | Extremely well-written with no grammatical, stylistic, and typographical errors. | |
Comments Extra Credit: Additional Observation (5 pts each) |