Back to Lecture Notes Home Page
Madero and the Wars of the Mexican Revolution
I. Revolution - What is it?
- A. Definition - A sudden, forceful overturn of established cultural, political, social, and economic institutions, usually
accompanied by violence, and their substitution with new institutions.
- B. A key question will be the "authenticity" of the Mexican Revolution
II. The Beginning of the End
- A. 1910 - few wanted Diaz to stay in power
- 1. Many rivals
- 2. But few interested in armed rebellion
- B. Election of 1910
- 1. Diaz tells American journalist he will retire
- 2. This draws out potential rivals
- 3. Diaz does run
III. Run-up to Francisco Madero's Rebellion
- A. To Diaz's shock, Francisco Madero begins campaigning
- B. Francisco Madero
- 1. Liberal landowner from Monterrey
- 2. Family had stakes in banks, textile mills, mines, wine.
- 3. Devoted to a humanistic liberalism
- 4. Abhorred autocracy of Diaz, servile Congress, corrupt judges
- 5. Defender of public education, personal liberty, enemy of one-man rule
- 6. For the benefit of other Diaz rival, wrote The Presidential Succession of 1910
- 7. Also represented the discontents of Northern elites
- 8. But he is not a "revolutionary"
- 9. A rebellion against Diaz, not a revolution against Mexican society
- C. Platform for election of 1910
- 1. free and honest elections
- 2. Municipal autonomy
- 3. Largely silent on social issues
- 4. Improve the "material, intellectual, and moral condition" of workers
- 5. Dwelt on need to curb drinking and gambling
- 6. Saw free public education as cure-all for social ills
- 7. In essence, classic Mexican liberalism
- D. Election
- 1. Madero tossed in jail on trumped up charge
- 2. Diaz, 80, overwhelmingly re-elected
- 3. Madero released on bail
- 4. Escaped to Texas
IV. Madero's Revolution: The Collapse of the Old Order (1910-1913)
- A. Announced Plan de San Luis Potosi
- 1. Essentially election platform
- a. Diaz must resign
- b. calls for electoral reforms
- c. demands honest, constitutional government
- d. Key idea - "Effective suffrage and no re-election"
- 2. Declared election of Diaz null and void
- 3. Set November 20 as date for rebellion
- B. Madero's Allies
- 1. Northern elites - Orozco
- 2. Northern malcontents - Villa
- 3. Peasant rebellion in south - Zapata
- C. The Rebellion
- 1. Madero dragged into fighting largely against his will
- 2. Villa and Orozco did most of the fighting
- 3. Both went against his wishes - he would put neither in his government
- D. Diaz resigns
- 1. Professional army defeated in most battle by ill-trained rebels
- 2. Diaz had a toothache - resigned
- 3. Madero, legalistic, would not take power without elections
- 4. Diaz's foreign affairs minister became caretaker till elections
- 5. Nor did he disarm the old army
- 6. Indeed, told rebels to disband
- 7. Nor did he call for new Congressional or state elections
- 8. Thus edifice of old regime remained in place
V. Madero in Power
- A. Inaugurated in November, 1911
- B. No vision or theory for Revolution, had unleashed forces he could not control
- C. A symbol for the need for change, himself a cautious reformer
- 1. Pursued moderate, classic Liberal reformism, which did nothing for poor
- 2. Wave of strikes, Madero made only tentative efforts
- 3. Biggest conflict was Zapata - could only see him as a bandit
- 4. Narrow urbanite, middle class base
- 5. Elites rebelled at his inability to control Zapata
- D. Overthrown by Victoriano Huerta in February, 1912 - and executed
VI. Huerta in Power - The Revolt of the Masses (1913-1915)
- A. Had been encouraged by US ambassador, Henry Lane Wilson
- B. Not a full-fledged return of Old Regime - some tentative reforms
- C. But rejected by many
- 1. Constitutionalists in the north - reasons Northern elites revolted
- a. Rejection of coup and military government
- b. Slump in the North
- c. Non-recognition by Wilson
- 2. Zapata in the south - agrarian Revolt
- D. Defeated in July, 1914 - the Porfirian army is defeated
VII. Three main armies involved in anti-Huerta war
- A. Emiliano Zapata - Agrarian Revolt
- 1. Small landholder - ran mule train, and sharecropped on a hacienda
- 2. Initially the leader of village of small landholders under pressure
- 3. Would come to lead large guerilla army of mestizo and Indian peasants
- 4. His army would fight the longest
- 5. Most radical of major revolutionary leaders
- 6. Came to represent agrarian revolt, social revolution
- a. Plan de Ayala, November, 1911 - "Tierra y liberatad" - "Land and Liberty"
- b. Want land - many followers fighting for land they lived on
- c. End power of local bosses
- d. small and large landholders
- e. Came to be recognized as national peasant leader
- f. Many urban leftists saw him as true revolutionary, joined him
- B. Pancho Villa - Misfits Revolt
- 1. From Durango
- 2. Wanted for cattle theft and murder at time of Madero rebellion
- 3. Highly professionalzed army - largest
- 4. The misfits of society
- 5. Peasants, unemployed cowboys and miners, bandits, second sons
- 6. Sought not to overturn society but to gain its spoils
- 7. Soldiers fought for position and promotion, middle-class respectability
- 8. Officers rose on military merit
- 9. Soldiers also fought for confiscated land, and refused to leave it
- 10. In many ways, the most conservative of the revolutionaries
- C. Venustiano Carranza - Northern Elite and Liberalism - The Constitutionalists
- 1. Former governor of Coahuila, took up Madero's standard
- 2. Devoted to constitutional rule and liberalism
- 3. Loosely allied to Wilson
- 4. Represented Northern elite
- 5. Believed that Mexico could only be ruled by the strong
- 6. A capitalist and hacendado, had no time for left or for Zapata
- 7. Led a professional army of mostly mercenaries
- 8. Officers were ranchers, minor entrepreneurs, hacendados
VIII. Characteristics of leaders
- A. Young (except Carranza)
- B. Almost all middle class
- C. Most from small towns, provinces
- D. Few were peasants or rural
- E. Occupations
- 1. Lawyers the largest group
- 2. School-teachers the next largest group
- a. Teachers played same role as lesser clergy in independence wars
- b. Most obvious example was Plutarco Elias Calles
- 3. Engineers were an important group
- 4. Physicians, journalists, and bankers played roles as well
- 5. Salesmen, clerks, merchants
- 6. Students
IX. Defeat of the Masses (1915-1920)
- A. Carranza in Dominant Position by October 1915
- B. Villa and Zapata reduced to small, guerrilla armies
- C. Carranza uninterested in social and agrarian reform
- 1. Did not regard land reform as a key issue
- 2. Issued a decree that gave very limited power to return seized land
- 3. Very much believed that capitalist competition would do the trick
- 4. Knew that people had to be considered; did not include them in power
- D. Two major failings
- 1. Unable to control corruption of generals, who divert reconstruction funds
- 2. Failure to reach out to masses means Zapata, Villa reassert themselves
- E. Weakening power seen in Constitution of 1917, which is more radical than he is
- 1. At odds with his own ideology
- 2. Delegates saw agrarian reform as key to settling countryside
- 3. Though the reform was ambiguous
- 4. Nationalistic - Mines was water could only be owned by Mexicans
- 5. Included a labor code
- a. legalizes unions, right to strike
- b. 8-hour day
- c. minimum wage, Sundays off
- d. But, put state in charge of arbitration
- 6. Gave Provinces power to regulate the Church
- F. Carranza brought down
- 1. Flu epidemic - 400,000 died
- 2. Economic slump
- 3. Tried to pick his own successor
- 4. Brought down by Alvaro Obregon, garbanzo farmer
X. Consolidation of the New Order (1920+)
- A. Carranza brought down, Obregon emerges triumphant, June 1920 - last man standing
- B. Zapata and Villa neutralized by Obregon by this point
- C. Military revolution is essentially over
- D. Northern (Sonoran) bourgeoisie now in power
Back to Lecture Notes Home Page