Legacy and Enemies of Porfiriato
                                
I. The era of Porfirio Diaz (1876-1911)
	- Plan de Tuxtepec (1876)
		- leads a revolt in 1876 when Lerdo tried to rig the election
 
		- Promises effective suffrage and no-reelection
 
		- War hero, strongly supported by military
 
		- Grants concessions to those who support him, while brutally crushing 
		opposition
 
		- In first term, takes popular nationalist stance against USA
 
		- Reduces government corruption
 
		- Stands aside to allow ally Manuel Gomez to be elected in 1882
 
		- Returns to presidency in 1888
 
	
	 
	- Governance and policies
		- Modernized the army, able to use it to consolidate control over 
		regional areas
 
		- Railroads built to enable small army to ensure control and defeat 
		rebellions
 
		- Rurales (rural military police) increased
			- Given broad freedom to violently out down banditry
 
			- Some 10,000 individuals "shot while trying to escape" (ley 
			fuga)
 
			- Decrease in banditry and rebellion encourages foreign investment
			
 
		
		 
		- Liberal anti-clerical laws left on books, but not enforced -- a 
		truce in church-state relations\
 
		- Improved relations with local governments
			- Became personal friends with most governors, and helped them 
			impose control 
 
			- Didn't always work; relations with elites in the northern border 
			states often poor
 
		
		 
		- Expanded the federal payroll 900% - government becomes main engine 
		for growth of the middle class
 
		- Expanded education
		
			- Mostly emphasized higher education
 
			- Expansion of primary education focused on cities, for the 
			children of elite and professional classes
 
		
		 
	
	 
                                
II. Achievements
	- Technological progress
	
		- built railway network 15,500 miles - seen as magic talisman for progress
		
 -  Expansion of electricity, telephone, telegraph, international banking, 
		early industry
 -  copied the Capitalist West
	
 
	 -  Winners
	
		- raw material exporters
		
 -  big merchant importers
		
 -  bankers
		
 -  infant middle class (within limits)
		
 -  ensured loyalty of Army by giving access to public trough to officers
		
 -  proclaimed policy of conciliation with Church
		
 - Several elite families emerge as powerful economic conglomarates
 
 
III. Nature of Growth
	- Importance of foreign investment
	
		- 1. 60% of foreign investment came from USA, mostly in mines and 
		railroads 
		
 - Free trade zone set up along the border in  1885, USA quickly 
		gains 40% of Mexican trade 
		
 -  U.S. monopolies allowed to develop in some industries
 -  Diaz 
		perused a number of policies to encourage foreign investment, despite 
		his own mistrust of the USA 
	
 
	 - Railroad had unintended consequences
	
		- drove price of land
		
 -  concentrated land more
		
 -  allowed debt peons to escape
		
 -  encouraged migration to prosperous regions
		
 - encouraged manufacturing as transport of goods became cheaper
 -  speculation produced enormous graft
		
 -  railroad control in foreign hands - best jobs, better pay
		
 -  railroads encouraged modern agriculture, which led to more exploitation
	
 
	 -  Industrialization
	
		-  large numbers of factories built
		
 -  many staffed and financed by foreigners 
		
 -  economy of scale produced high prices
	
 
	 -  Working Class
	
		-  800,000 workers
 - mostly in light industry, but also mining, 
		communications, and transportation
 - 16-18 hour days
		
 -  many deductions from wages
		
 -  no worker protections
		
 -  Many made less than a dollar a week
		
 -  appalling living conditions led to a mortality rate twice that of USA
		
 -  economic problems 1900-1910 squeezed them out, as price of 
		food doubled while salaries remained stagnant
 -  salaries did not change while food doubled
		
 -  These people did not share positivist values
		
			- some 250 strikes during the Diaz period
 - strongly 
			nationalistic -- many strikes aimed against foreign employers and 
			privileges of foreign workers
 
	 
	 - Middle Class
	
		-  middle class some 8-10% of population
		
 -  middle class aped the style of the rich; tended to overspend
 
	
		-  hodpodge not culturally unified
		
 -  growing middle class could not find enough jobs - eked out living as teachers, etc
		
 -  Greatly resented that select few enjoyed political spoils
		
 -  very little turnover in offices
	
 
	 -  Advent of industry brought new values
	
		-  cyclical markets caused a number of disruptions
		
 -  ironically, most advanced regions became most troubled
		
 -  Sonora richest state, from USA financed mining, but had little political power
	
 
 
IV. Land
	- 95% of rural population had none
	
 -  Only 10% of Indian communities still had land -- ejidos shrank in 
	face of railroads, expansion of commercial agriculture and ranching
 -  Heavy 
	privatization of land
	
		- 1000 families owned most of Mexico
		
 -  1/4 owned by foreigner, 1/4 by 200 families
	
 
	 -  Huge pressure form great majority of population, which was landless peasants
 
V. Race
	-  8.7 million became 15 million during Pofiriato
	
 -  20% white, 43% mestizo, 37% Indian
	
 - But white positivist technocrats (cientificos), a few 
	elite families, foreigners, and military held most of power
 
VI. Clearly, Mexico explosive