Back to Lecture Notes Home Page
Madero and the Wars of the Mexican Revolution
I. Revolution - What is it?
- A. Definition - A sudden, forceful overturn of established cultural, political, social, and economic institutions, usually
accompanied by violence, and their substitution with new institutions.
- B. A key question will be the "authenticity" of the Mexican Revolution
II. The Beginning of the End
- A. 1910 - few wanted Diaz to stay in power
- 1. Many rivals
- 2. But few interested in armed rebellion
- B. Election of 1910
- 1. Diaz tells American journalist he will retire
- 2. This draws out potential rivals
- 3. Diaz does run
III. Run-up to Francisco Madero's Rebellion
- A. To Diaz's shock, Francisco Madero begins campaigning
- B. Francisco Madero
- 1. Liberal landowner from Monterrey
- 2. Family had stakes in banks, textile mills, mines, wine.
- 3. Devoted to a humanistic liberalism
- 4. Abhorred autocracy of Diaz, servile Congress, corrupt judges
- 5. Defender of public education, personal liberty, enemy of one-man rule
- 6. For the benefit of other Diaz rival, wrote The Presidential Succession of 1910
- 7. Also represented the discontents of Northern elites
- 8. But he is not a "revolutionary"
- 9. A rebellion against Diaz, not a revolution against Mexican society
- C. Platform for election of 1910
- 1. free and honest elections
- 2. Municipal autonomy
- 3. Largely silent on social issues
- 4. Improve the "material, intellectual, and moral condition" of workers
- 5. Dwelt on need to curb drinking and gambling
- 6. Saw free public education as cure-all for social ills
- 7. In essence, classic Mexican liberalism
- D. Election
- 1. Madero tossed in jail on trumped up charge
- 2. Diaz, 80, overwhelmingly re-elected
- 3. Madero released on bail
- 4. Escaped to Texas
IV. Madero's Revolution: The Collapse of the Old Order (1910-1913)
- A. Announced Plan de San Luis Potosi
- 1. Essentially election platform
- a. Diaz must resign
- b. calls for electoral reforms
- c. demands honest, constitutional government
- d. Key idea - "Effective suffrage and no re-election"
- 2. Declared election of Diaz null and void
- 3. Set November 20 as date for rebellion
- B. Madero's Allies
- 1. Northern elites - Orozco
- 2. Northern malcontents - Villa
- 3. Peasant rebellion in south - Zapata
- C. The Rebellion
- 1. Madero dragged into fighting largely against his will
- 2. Villa and Orozco did most of the fighting
- 3. Both went against his wishes - he would put neither in his government
- D. Diaz resigns
- 1. Professional army defeated in most battle by ill-trained rebels
- 2. Diaz had a toothache - resigned
- 3. Madero, legalistic, would not take power without elections
- 4. Diaz's foreign affairs minister became caretaker till elections
- 5. Nor did he disarm the old army
- 6. Indeed, told rebels to disband
- 7. Nor did he call for new Congressional or state elections
- 8. Thus edifice of old regime remained in place
V. Madero in Power
- A. Inaugurated in November, 1911
- B. No vision or theory for Revolution, had unleashed forces he could not control
- C. A symbol for the need for change, himself a cautious reformer
- 1. Pursued moderate, classic Liberal reformism, which did nothing for poor
- 2. Wave of strikes, Madero made only tentative efforts
- 3. Biggest conflict was Zapata - could only see him as a bandit
- 4. Narrow urbanite, middle class base
- 5. Elites rebelled at his inability to control Zapata
- D. Overthrown by Victoriano Huerta in February, 1912 - and executed
VI. Huerta in Power - The Revolt of the Masses (1913-1915)
- A. Had been encouraged by US ambassador, Henry Lane Wilson
- B. Not a full-fledged return of Old Regime - some tentative reforms
- C. But rejected by many
- 1. Constitutionalists in the north - reasons Northern elites revolted
- a. Rejection of coup and military government
- b. Slump in the North
- c. Non-recognition by Wilson
- 2. Zapata in the south - agrarian Revolt
- D. Defeated in July, 1914 - the Porfirian army is defeated
VII. Three main armies involved in anti-Huerta war
- A. Emiliano Zapata - Agrarian Revolt
- 1. Small landholder - ran mule train, and sharecropped on a hacienda
- 2. Initially the leader of village of small landholders under pressure
- 3. Would come to lead large guerilla army of mestizo and Indian peasants
- 4. His army would fight the longest
- 5. Most radical of major revolutionary leaders
- 6. Came to represent agrarian revolt, social revolution
- a. Plan de Ayala, November, 1911 - "Tierra y liberatad" - "Land and Liberty"
- b. Want land - many followers fighting for land they lived on
- c. End power of local bosses
- d. small and large landholders
- e. Came to be recognized as national peasant leader
- f. Many urban leftists saw him as true revolutionary, joined him
- B. Pancho Villa - Misfits Revolt
- 1. From Durango
- 2. Wanted for cattle theft and murder at time of Madero rebellion
- 3. Highly professionalized army - largest
- 4. The misfits of society
- 5. Peasants, unemployed cowboys and miners, bandits, second sons
- 6. Sought not to overturn society but to gain its spoils
- 7. Soldiers fought for position and promotion, middle-class respectability
- 8. Officers rose on military merit
- 9. Soldiers also fought for confiscated land, and refused to leave it
- 10. In many ways, the most conservative of the revolutionaries
- C. Venustiano Carranza - Northern Elite and Liberalism - The Constitutionalists
- 1. Former governor of Coahuila, took up Madero's standard
- 2. Devoted to constitutional rule and liberalism
- 3. Loosely allied to Wilson
- 4. Represented Northern elite
- 5. Believed that Mexico could only be ruled by the strong
- 6. A capitalist and hacendado, had no time for left or for Zapata
- 7. Led a professional army of mostly mercenaries
- 8. Officers were ranchers, minor entrepreneurs, hacendados
VIII. Characteristics of leaders
- A. Young (except Carranza)
- B. Almost all middle class
- C. Most from small towns, provinces
- D. Few were peasants or rural
- E. Occupations
- 1. Lawyers the largest group
- 2. School-teachers the next largest group
- a. Teachers played same role as lesser clergy in independence wars
- b. Most obvious example was Plutarco Elias Calles
- 3. Engineers were an important group
- 4. Physicians, journalists, and bankers played roles as well
- 5. Salesmen, clerks, merchants
- 6. Students
IX. Defeat of the Masses (1915-1920)
- A. Carranza in Dominant Position by October 1915
- B. Villa and Zapata reduced to small, guerrilla armies
- C. Carranza uninterested in social and agrarian reform
- 1. Did not regard land reform as a key issue
- 2. Issued a decree that gave very limited power to return seized land
- 3. Very much believed that capitalist competition would do the trick
- 4. Knew that people had to be considered; did not include them in power
- D. Two major failings
- 1. Unable to control corruption of generals, who divert reconstruction funds
- 2. Failure to reach out to masses means Zapata, Villa reassert themselves
- E. Weakening power seen in Constitution of 1917, which is more radical than he is
- 1. At odds with his own ideology
- 2. Delegates saw agrarian reform as key to settling countryside
- 3. Though the reform was ambiguous
- 4. Nationalistic - Mines was water could only be owned by Mexicans
- 5. Included a labor code
- a. legalizes unions, right to strike
- b. 8-hour day
- c. minimum wage, Sundays off
- d. But, put state in charge of arbitration
- 6. Gave Provinces power to regulate the Church
- F. Carranza brought down
- 1. Flu epidemic - 400,000 died
- 2. Economic slump
- 3. Tried to pick his own successor
- 4. Brought down by Alvaro Obregon, garbanzo farmer
X. Consolidation of the New Order (1920+)
- A. Carranza brought down, Obregon emerges triumphant, June 1920 - last man standing
- B. Zapata and Villa neutralized by Obregon by this point
- C. Military revolution is essentially over
- D. Northern (Sonoran) bourgeoisie now in power
The Sonoran Dynasty - Aftermath of the Wars of Revolution
I. 1920 - What to do?
- A. Enormous Destruction
- 1. One million dead
- 2. ruined mining, ranching, farming
- 3. No major bank or newspaper survived the war
- 4. only oil improved (needed in war)
- B. What Ideology?
- 1. No single ideology fueled the war
- 2. A revolution of discontent, but no single vision
- 3. Much side-switching had taken place
- 4. many plans meant no plans
- 5. Painfully obvious that government would have to build an ideology out of experience
II. Alvaro Obregon and the Founding of the Sonoran Dynasty
- A. Obregon and the Sonorans
- 1. People now in charge largely from Sonora
- 2. Sonoran Dynasty will create a government of "savage pragmatism"
- 3. survivors of war and the harsh land of the northern frontier
- 4. alien to most Mexicans - saw themselves as Californians of Mexico
- 5. Greate cultural divide
- B. Obregon in power (1920-1924)
- 1. enlightened despotism + capitalism + corruption
- 2. Enlightened despotism meant Sonorans governed as an empire, imposing rule and order on a
heterogeneous
majority
- 3. Began building a capitalist, modern state
- 4. Power based on triad - army, agraristas (Zapata's people), unions
- 5. Each leg supported government, checked the others
- 6. bound together by nationalism
- 7. Wealthy elites enriched but kept out of power
- 8. Catholic Church becomes de facto opposition party
III. Jose Vasconselos and Culture Under the Revolution
- A. Minister of Education under Obregon
- B. Patron of the arts - would establish a new nationalism
- C. Key organizer of ideology of the revolution
- 1. Old, pre-Revolution concept of nationalism had focused on Spanish heritage
- 2. Old nationalism had been dismissive of Amerindian and mestizo culture
- 3. Vasconselos sought to create a unifying nationalism
- 4. Two main ideas:
- a. Indigenismo - Mexico should be proud of Amerindian heritage
- b. Cosmic race - Mexico strong because it mixed the best of all the world's races
- 5. New focus on indigenous culture
- 6. Cuahtemoc (last Aztec leader to fight Spanish) becomes new national hero
- D. Education
- 1. rapid building of schools and libraries
- 2. Millions of cheap books provided to libraries (promoting government approved ideas)
- 3. Rural teachers become missionaries of new regime - the "new Franciscans"
- 4. Inevitable conflict with the Catholic Church
- E. Arts
- 1. all arts must support the new crusade
- 2. Mexico, Vasconselos warned, must not be Americanized, like Texas or Puerto Rico
- 3. Key development is new school of muralists, largely commissioned by Vasconselos
- a. muralism a pre-Spanish tradition, thus fits neatly in new ideology
- b. also, great as a teaching art in society with many illiterates - teaching art important to Vasconselos
- c. Diego Rivera the most important - also Siqueiros and Orozco
- F. Of course, one problem - how do define "Indian" or "indigenous"?
IV. Other Reforms Under Obregon
- A. Obregon something of a reformer - had forced the more radical portions of the 1917 Constitution
- B. Some land redistribution (3 million acres)
- C. Unions legalized
- D. But....
- 1. redistributed land often belonged to Obregon's enemies
- 2. much "redistributed" into hands of the generals
- 3. Land reform extensive in Morelos, where Zapata's soldiers were, not so much elsewhere
- 4. Unions legal, but riddled with corruption, represented only a fraction of the people
V. Plutarco Elias Calles (1924-1928) and the later part of the Sonoran Dynasty
- A. Former schoolteacher, last survivor of the major revolutionary leaders
- B. Essentially a nationalist
- 1. Got into conflict with USA over attempt to nationalize oil - backed down
- 2. looking to save face, picks on Church instead
- C. Cristero Revolt
- 1. Calles sought to enforce anti-clerical provisions of Constitution
- 2. Church, provoked by educational reforms, Calles, and efforts of some to create a new church, preaches
rebellion
- 3. Church goes on strike July 31, 1926
- 4. Spontaneous rural revolts break out - full scale rebellion by January, 1927
- 5. Eventually, a compromise is forced
- D. Calles begins process of institutionalizing revolution
- 1. Creates a political party, the PNR
- 2. This is the ancestor of modern PRI, which still governs Mexico
- E. Agrarian reform
- 1. not much - start and stop
- 2. by 1934, less than 10% of land redistributed
- 3. Often resulted in local violence
- F. Maximato - Calles rules from behind the scenes, 1928-1934
Mexico: The Era of Lazaro Cardenas
I. Lazaro Cardenas - President 1934-40, dominant to 1946
- A. Breaks the power of Calles, brings and end to Sonoran Dynasty
- B. Radical nationalist project - last great reformist period of the Mexican Revolution
- C. Culmination of the social revolution
- D. Continuities with Sonoran Dynasty - state-building, developmental capitalism
- E. Origins of Cardenismo (his political ideas/movement)
- 1. In the Revolution itself
- 2. In the Depression and the resentments it brought
- 3. In the successive political crises
- 4. Rejection of Sonoran values by disillusioned veterans of the wars of 1910-1920
- 5. In the increasingly interventionist economic policies of Calles
II. Agrarian Reform
- A. Why?
- 1. Strict political reasons - do in enemies, reward supporters
- 2. Cardenas had a rural background, and a real affection for peasants
- 3. Vision of the ejido tied to state-run capitalist development
- a. ejido - the communal lands of an Ameridian community
- b. became principal vehichle to rejuvenate the countryside
- c. land distributed collectively for political and economic reasons
- d. liberate the peasants from large landowners
- e. way to give peasants land without breaking up the countryside
into tiny plots
- f. this meant the peasants could be empowered by getting land while working large farms to produce goods for export
- g. money earned from export could be used for national development
- h. thus it is a way to marry peasants' cravings for land with government's
desire to build industry
- B. Achievments
- 1. Distributed 45 million acres, compared to just 19 million by Sonoran Dynasty
- 2. 800,000 people got land this way
- 3. 47% of Mexico's arable lands went to ejidos - this was not junk land
- 4. Government pumped money into ejidos - support, training, roads, electricity, etc.
- 5. This government support was crucial to ejido's economic success
- 6. Done all-out, not gradually
- 7. Provided real social uplift
- 8. Not as productive as private farms, but commercially viable
- C. Problems
- 1. weakened as political will faded
- 2. After Cardenas, much of the supporting institutions evaporated
- 3. Stratification between those on ejidos and rural laborers
- 4. became way of controlling peasantry
- D. Long-term
- 1. Since 1910, 245 million acres have been redistributed in Mexico
- 2. But unable to keep up with population growth
- 3. Thus in 1980s there were 4 million landless rural workers - more than in 1910
III. Education
- A. Agrarian reform and education closely linked
- 1. Cardenas carried on Obregon's use of the rural teacher as foot-soldier of the revolution
- 2. Only a "modern" peasant could take advantage of ejido and agrarian reform
- B. "Socialist Education" - revolution imposed from above
- 1. secularization of education - taking control of education away from priests
- 2. sex-education
- 3. collectivist ethic and class consciousness
- 4. social change through education (something the Positivists had believed in)
- 5. Promotion of Vasconselos's idea of indegenismo as an assault on poverty and inequality
- C. Response of Peasants
- 1. peasants mostly tepid
- 2. failed to inspire them or invigorate rural loyalty to government
- D. Implementation
- 1. many more public schools built
- 2. Particularly in communities defined as Indian (those communities that spoke
Indian languages)
- 3. Designed to liberate Indians without destroying their cultures
- 4. Problematic, as they were taught as peasant, not as Indians
- 5. Makes Indians a problem for national government, undermining local bosses
- E. The rural teacher (maestro)
- 1. meant to be new priest - government saw Indians as a mass that had to be molded
- 2. teachers had success where they responded to local needs and customs
- 3. work was inherently political and risky
- 4. many were met with violence when they challenged established practices too much
- F. Catholic response
- 1. provided primary competition/opposition
- 2. took strong stance against "socialist" education, including sex ed, medical services.
- G. Long-term impact
- 1. illiteracy went down
- 2. schools became strong vehicle for nationalism, for binding nation together
- 3. generally failed to radicalize the peasantry
Back to Lecture Notes Home Page